politics

Court: “Because Trump said to” may not be a legally valid defense

The “arbitrary and capricious” standard strikes down another administration action.

Court: “Because Trump said to” may not be a legally valid defense

TL;DR

  • US District Court Judge Patti Saris vacated a Trump executive order that halted offshore wind power development.
  • The order suspended all permitting for wind power on federal land and waters pending a review.
  • States and wind power industry groups sued, arguing the suspension was arbitrary and capricious.
  • The court found the government's defense relied solely on the former president's directive, lacking a reasoned explanation.
  • The ruling does not guarantee immediate approval of wind projects but removes a legal basis for indefinite delays.
  • Further lawsuits may occur if agencies continue to slow-walk leasing and licensing processes.